7 Responses to “Why I’m Antisocial”

1. Rachelskirts on February 17th, 2008 9:03 pm

   Amen.

2. Alexandarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr on February 19th, 2008 12:07 am

   Interacting with the absolute minimum number of people, which seems like it would be 0, shouldn’t provide the highest value of interaction since there is no quality of interaction whatsoever. Unless you’re really into yourself. Like, Maynard into yourself. Graph is null, void. Also, is blue-ray really going to become the primary media format? Cause I really resent the idea of using a disc that sounds like a Megaman underwater boss.

3. Tez on February 19th, 2008 12:18 pm

   What makes you think the beginning of the graph is 0? It obviously starts at 1.

   And yes, Blu-Ray is going to become the primary HD media format, and the fact that it sounds like a Megaman boss is the only reason it’s okay (HD-DVD was better/cheaper).

4. Davis Beacon on February 19th, 2008 2:44 pm

   Well I assumed it would start at zero because the data from zero to one breaks the trend illustrated by the graph and to omit such valuable info is yet another tell tale sign of an amateur grapher. AND FUCK THESE FUCKING DORKS. I KNEW IN MY HEART THAT HD-DVD WAS BETTER. I COULD FEEL IT IN MY BONES TOO. AND MY SOUL! AND NOW I’M GOING TO BE STUCK TALKING LIKE A POWER RANGER WHENEVER I WANT TO BURN A DISC.

5. Tez on February 19th, 2008 2:55 pm

   AMATEUR GRAPHER? DO YOU NOT SEE THE ROUNDED EDGES? THE SHINY SHEEN? THE GRAPH LINES? AMATEUR MY ASS!

   The graph is specifically about interacting with people, therefore the range of zero to one is irrelevant. If it bothers you so much, go to crappygraphs.com and make a correct one.

6. Davis Beacon on February 19th, 2008 3:27 pm

   you can SOOOOO interact with 0 people

7. Al on September 11th, 2008 9:59 am

   Hahaha. This is the best conversation I have seen in ages. More stupid graphs!!!

Leave a Reply